Tesla Race Harassment Cases- Click Here to Learn About Them
×
≡Menu
Search

Christensen v. Alfasigma

Home
/
Christensen v. Alfasigma

Christensen v. Alfasigma

State ex rel. Christensen v. Alfasigma
Case No. RG16807318

(Alam. Co. Super. Ct. May 8, 2019)

Denying defendant’s summary judgment in qui tam, Insurance Frauds Prevention Act suit under Ins. Code 1871.7, stating: “The Court finds that there is sufficient evidence demonstrating a triable issue of fact as to whether Defendant knowingly made false and misleading statements, or knowingly concealed or failed to disclose material information, with respect to the availability of generic versions of the Brand Medical Foods.”.

Share this post
facebookLinkedin

Looking For
Help With Your
Workplace Concerns?

Bryan Schwartz Law, P.C. is also one of the few Bay Area-based law firms with extensive experience representing Federal employees in their unique Merit Systems Protection Board and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaints.

What Our Clients
Say About Us

Contact Us*

Our firm is not currently accepting new clients due to our caseload. If you have information about an existing matter or are a class member in a pending case, please click the button below to contact us or call our office.

Review

Your privacy choices

Privacy preferences

Use this control to opt out of sale or sharing of personal information for cross-context behavioral advertising. On this website, opting out also stops optional analytics and advertising tracking in this browser. See our privacy statement.

Turn this off and save your choice to stop optional tracking. Contact forms and direct scheduling links remain available.