Former JetBlue flight attendant Steven Slater has become something of a polarizing figure over the last few months—a folk hero to some,and a fraud to others. While working aboard a Pittsburg to JFK flight that had just landed, the JetBlue flight attendant lost his patience after reportedly enduring verbal abuse from a passenger. Slater made a grand exit by grabbing a beer in each hand, deploying the plane’s emergency slide, and broadcasting his resignation over the public address system. He then slid away, got in his car, and went home. Slater currently faces criminal charges for his actions. He is also reportedly in talks for a reality show in which he would “help other people quit their jobs in the most flamboyant way possible.” 
For those exasperated with their jobs, Slater’s story may be inspiring—he lived out a fantasy many have at one time or another during their working lives. Telling the boss what you really think of him or her and making a grand exit may sound like a satisfying finish to a frustrating job. However, from a legal perspective, this almost never benefits any potential employment claims you may have premised on wrongful termination. More often, it is likely to foreclose many claims that you would otherwise have been able to plead. Why is this? Simply put, you cannot challenge a termination, except in very limited circumstances, if you quit.
Employees can sometimes still claim wrongful termination if they quit under circumstances referred to as “constructive discharge.” To sustain a constructive discharge claim under California law, an employee must show:
(1) The conditions or actions of the employer were so intolerable or aggravated that a reasonable person in her position would have resigned
(2) The employer actually knew of the conditions, and
(3)The employer could have remedied the situation but did not. 
Furthermore, a single or trivial incident of misconduct by an employer is not enough to establish a claim.  The California Supreme Court in Turner v. Anheuser-Busch emphasized that “[t]he conditions giving rise to the resignation must be sufficiently extraordinary and egregious to overcome the normal motivation of a competent, diligent, and reasonable employee to remain on the job to earn a livelihood and to serve his or her employer. The proper focus is on whether the resignation was coerced, not whether it was simply one rational option for the employee.” 
Though many workers may feel like their workplace is intolerable, the standard to show this in court is very high. Some examples of situations that have been found not to be constructive discharge include receiving a poor performance rating, accompanied by a demotion and reduction in pay;  reducing compensation and a changed annual bonus structure;  and, being sexually harassed by a supervisor, as long as the employer issues the supervisor a letter of reprimand.  Therefore, by and large, a constructive discharge claim is a loser.
A final consideration, if you are thinking of quitting your job, is that it can be far more difficult to receive unemployment insurance if you resign, depending on your situation. 
If you think your rights have been violated in the workplace, contact an attorney at Bryan Schwartz Law, P.C. right away, before you make the decision to quit.
 As an example, see Newsweek’s Seven Reasons We Love Steven Slater, available at http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/16/7-reasons-we-love-steven-slater.html
 Note that his story has not been substantiated by subsequent investigations. See http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703453804575480113748502880.html?KEYWORDS=steven+slater
 Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1238
 Turner, 7 Cal.4th at 1246 (emphasis added)
 Id. at 1247
 King v. AC & R Advertising (9th Cir. 1995) 65 F.3d 764, 767
 Casenas v. Fujisawa USA, Inc. (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 101, 110
Bryan Schwartz and team are stellar professionals. I worked really closely with Renato Flores. He was patient and showed a lot of care and rigor in explaining the ins and out to me and the practical advice he shared was outstanding. Bryan is well connected…
Exceptional people, powerful advocates, tough negotiators. Bryan Schwartz and senior associate Jane Mackie truly care about fairness and justice. Their hard work, attention to detail, and the time and responsiveness they devoted to all my questions let me know in a hundred ways that they…
I cannot say enough GREAT things about Bryan Schwartz Law, P.C. -- and in particular, former paralegal Devin Stuzin. I was recently part of a large class-action settlement -- one the firm tenaciously pursued for a whopping 17 years before getting a record settlement on…
Best people they took my case right a way and fought and win my case best lawyers in bay-area love you all
I was a member of the Doering Meyer class action lawsuit versus the State Department. Bryan Schwartz is a very tenacious and outstanding attorney. When this law firm first contacted me about the case, I was skeptical about their ability to win a case against…
Bryan Schwartz Law, P.C., is a leading employment rights law firm in the United States with a global reach. His is a legal practice of conscientiousness and virtue. Labor law protects a most fundamental right of citizenship and civic engagement. Worker rights are human rights.…
A great team, who kept me informed every step of the way along a many year path to winning a successful class action case.
The staff at this firm are very professional, responsive, friendly, and effective. They persevere for years to get results. I highly recommend them.
Amazing experience with communication and handling of this massive case; I appreciate the help and resolution.
I had a great experience with the firm. They represented me and others in a case that lasted for several years, yet I always knew who to contact and they were always responsive and professional, even as more junior team members transitioned over the years.…
Submit an inquiry to have Bryan Schwartz Law, P.C. evaluate your situation.
*Your submission of an intake request form does not guarantee that Bryan Schwartz Law, P.C. will take your case or provide legal advice. You must be offered and sign a representation agreement with the firm before you will receive any legal advice.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.