“Georgetown University Accused of Disability Discrimination”
Courthouse News Service, November 29, 2016
by Laura Bittner
WASHINGTON (CN) – A teacher claims in a class-action lawsuit that he lost an English fellowship position because Georgetown University denied him unconditional medical clearance based on his disability.
Lead plaintiff Tait Bergstrom is an educator who has previously taught courses at universities in China for about six years, according to the complaint he filed last week in Washington, D.C., federal court against Georgetown University and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry.
Last year, Bergstrom accepted a conditional offer from Georgetown to work as an English language fellow in China. The English language program offered by the university is sponsored by the
U.S. Department of State, according to Georgetown’s website. The fellow positions are described on a State Department website as 10-month programs “for professionals with a graduate degree in English language teaching and two years’ classroom [teachers of English to speakers of other languages, or TESOL] teaching experience.”
Bergstrom says the teaching position is contingent on applicants passing a medical exam by a State Department doctor.
After accepting the employment offer, Bergstrom submitted extensive medical information for the exam, which he claims supports his ability to serve as an English language fellow.
Bergstrom does have a disability, but says he has experienced no difficulty during his previous years in China because of it.
He claims his disability, which is not specified in his lawsuit, is recognized under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977.
Roughly two weeks after Bergstrom was offered the fellow position, the offer was rescinded due to the medical exam, he claims. According to the Nov. 23 complaint, the doctor conducting the examination denied Bergstrom unconditional medical clearance because he did not include a treatment plan for his conditions while he would be teaching in China.
Bergstrom claims he was never given an opportunity to submit documentation of his treatment plan, and the health verification form he was given as part of the clearance process did not have any area requesting him to submit a treatment plan.
After hearing his results, Bergstrom consulted with a Georgetown employee to see if there was a way to contest the denial, but he was told there was no appeal process available, the complaint states. Bergstrom says the hiring process is discriminatory because no one with an actual or perceived disability will receive unconditional medical clearance, with or without reasonable accommodation.
He alleges the fellow program’s hiring policy violates the Rehab Act and the D.C. Human Rights Act. Bergstrom wants to represent a proposed class of all people who have lost job opportunities since April 2015 because the State Department and Georgetown denied them unconditional medical clearance.
He seeks injunctive relief against the medical clearance policy, as well as compensatory and punitive damages, and is represented by Bryan Schwartz in Oakland, Calif.
Neither Georgetown nor the State Department organization responsible for the English language programs responded Tuesday to requests for comment.
When no other attorney would touch my case, Bryan took it on with zeal. Since then, the EEOC certified a class action and has ruled in our favor in every motion the other side has thrown at us. A five-star rating does not come close…
I was fortunate to have found Bryan Schwartz Law while searching for reputable and reliable law firms in the Oakland area that specialized in labor law, and I couldn’t be more pleased by the results they secured for my family on my father’s behalf! After…
Bryan's firm came highly recommended to deal with an employment discrimination and harassment case. Bryan and his staff were very professional, ethical, extremely organized and diligent. They are strong advocates who worked extremely hard to get me a very fair resolution to my case. I…
Bryan Schwartz is an attorney who gives good, sound advice and empowers you to believe in your convictions. I reached out to him because no other attorney wanted to assist me. Bryan has been my advocate for the last six years. He is compassionate, empathetic…
Bryan Schwartz is without a doubt a fantastic attorney. As tenacious as he is intelligent, I would absolutely recommend his services to anyone seeking justice. Not only is his legal expertise top notch, his interpersonal skills with his clients are superb as well. Working with…
Bryan and his team were highly recommended by a friend and another attorney. I reached out to Bryan when I was sick, hurting and afraid, not knowing what to expect or how to ask for help. Bryan offered to help, he and his team fought…
When I first met Bryan, and the team at Bryan Schwartz Law, I was blown away by how understanding, sympathetic, and outright dismayed they were to the unlawful situation my coworkers and I were (to say the least) uncomfortably having to endure and work through.…
Bryan Schwartz represented me successfully in mediating my age discrimination claim against a large employer....[T]here can be few lawyers with greater legal acumen or a more relentless drive to get an acceptable result for their clients. Bryan is all business and probably works too hard.…
I could never imagine having any other attorney on my side when I needed someone. This office is beyond professional and intelligent from the person answering the phone right to the attorneys. These attorneys will fight tooth and nail for you.
These guys were amazing. Just on the ball, knowledgeable and friendly as hell. I presented my case over the phone and I immediately got some preliminary feedback which was awesome. I was asked for more details which I provided via email the next day. Two…
Schedule an initial consultation to have Bryan Schwartz Law
evaluate your situation.
*Your submission of an intake request form does not guarantee that Bryan Schwartz Law will take your case or provide legal advice. You must be offered and sign a representation agreement with the firm before you will receive any legal advice.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.