“Bank of America Settles Overtime Class Action for $36 Million”
Daily Journal, August 27, 2015
Class argued that appraisers shouldn’t be exempt from overtime pay in case against Bank of America subsidiary
By Gautham Thomas, Daily Journal Staff Writer
A group of real estate appraisers and Bank of America Corp. along with its appraisal subsidiary reached a $36 million settlement in a pending class action.
The 365 class members will receive an average gross recovery of about $100,000 each, according to plaintiff’s attorney Bryan Schwartz of Bryan Schwartz Law. The preliminary settlement agreement, filed Monday in federal court, is subject to court approval onSept. 21.
The class action, filed under the Federal Labor Standards Act and for violations of the California Labor Code, contended that property appraisers employed by LandSafe Inc., a Bank of America subsidiary, should not be exempted from overtime pay and other labor protections. The settlement agreement came days before trial was scheduled to begin. Boyd v. Bank of America, CV13-0561 (C.D. Cal., filed April 9, 2013).
A previous portion of the case with a class of review appraisers settled in 2014 for $5.8 million.
U.S. District Judge David O. Carter on May 6 granted several motions for summary judgment on behalf of the plaintiffs, ruling staff appraisers for LandSafe were not subject to overtime exemptions under federal and state law.
LandSafe was seeking interlocutory review by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, but the motion is on hold pending the settlement, according to Schwartz.
“There is no 9th Circuit decision about real estate appraisers. There were none in the country before this [district court] decision,” Schwartz said.
Robert Lewis, a spokesperson for McGuire Woods LLP, counsel for LandSafe and Bank of America, declined comment.
The plaintiffs contended that they were misclassified as salaried employees exempt from overtime pay and mandated meal breaks.
Overtime exemptions apply if an employee performs administrative or professional functions, is a learned professional or is classified as a highly-compensated employee. These exemptions require the application of discretion and independent judgment, something plaintiffs argued staff appraisers could not exercise.
“Appraisers aren’t negotiating with anyone and they aren’t making any decisions when it comes to money,” said Schwartz. “It’s not up to the appraiser whether the bank hands out a loan.”
Schwartz pointed to the “administrative/production dichotomy” – because appraisers were engaged primarily with producing the company’s product and not administrating the company’s policy as a whole, they could not be considered exempt.
Similar employee classification cases in the mortgage industry have been decided both ways.
A previous misclassification case, Davis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 587 F.3d 529 (2d Cir. 2009), found mortgage underwriters to be non-exempt employees, but more recently, McKeen-Chaplin v. Provident Savings Bank, FSB, 12-CV03035 (E.D. Cal., filed Dec. 17, 2012) found mortgage underwriters to be exempt under federal labor law.
About half the class members in the settlement are in California, with the rest outside the state, according to Wilmer J. Harris of Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP, who worked with Schwartz on the class action.
“LandSafe is pleased to bring this matter to resolution,” said Bank of America spokesperson Jumana Bowens in a prepared statement. “We continue to believe the past decision to classify staff appraisers, who are responsible for the analysis of each property, have assignments that clearly are professional in nature, and as such, the classification of these positions as exempt was appropriate. However, we agreed to settle to avoid further legal costs.”
Bank of America acquired LandSafe in 2008 when it purchased Countrywide Financial Corp. Earlier this month, Bank of America sold LandSafe’s appraisal services to Irvine data company CoreLogic, though the details of the sale have not been officially disclosed.
In August 2014, Robert Madsen, a former LandSafe appraiser, received a $56 million whistleblower payment from Bank of America’s $16.65 billion mortgage fraud settlement. Bank of America and LandSafe used improper appraisal practices to inflate the value of bank-held mortgages, Madsen alleged.
Kyle Lagow, another former LandSafe appraiser, received a $14.5 million whistleblower payment in 2012 from a $1 billion Bank of America settlement. Lagow alleged that Countrywide, partner KB Home and LandSafe cooperated to inflate home appraisals.
Daily Journal Newswire Article
© 2015 The Daily Journal Corporation. All rights reserved.
When no other attorney would touch my case, Bryan took it on with zeal. Since then, the EEOC certified a class action and has ruled in our favor in every motion the other side has thrown at us. A five-star rating does not come close…
I was fortunate to have found Bryan Schwartz Law while searching for reputable and reliable law firms in the Oakland area that specialized in labor law, and I couldn’t be more pleased by the results they secured for my family on my father’s behalf! After…
Bryan's firm came highly recommended to deal with an employment discrimination and harassment case. Bryan and his staff were very professional, ethical, extremely organized and diligent. They are strong advocates who worked extremely hard to get me a very fair resolution to my case. I…
Bryan Schwartz is an attorney who gives good, sound advice and empowers you to believe in your convictions. I reached out to him because no other attorney wanted to assist me. Bryan has been my advocate for the last six years. He is compassionate, empathetic…
Bryan Schwartz is without a doubt a fantastic attorney. As tenacious as he is intelligent, I would absolutely recommend his services to anyone seeking justice. Not only is his legal expertise top notch, his interpersonal skills with his clients are superb as well. Working with…
Bryan and his team were highly recommended by a friend and another attorney. I reached out to Bryan when I was sick, hurting and afraid, not knowing what to expect or how to ask for help. Bryan offered to help, he and his team fought…
When I first met Bryan, and the team at Bryan Schwartz Law, I was blown away by how understanding, sympathetic, and outright dismayed they were to the unlawful situation my coworkers and I were (to say the least) uncomfortably having to endure and work through.…
Bryan Schwartz represented me successfully in mediating my age discrimination claim against a large employer....[T]here can be few lawyers with greater legal acumen or a more relentless drive to get an acceptable result for their clients. Bryan is all business and probably works too hard.…
I could never imagine having any other attorney on my side when I needed someone. This office is beyond professional and intelligent from the person answering the phone right to the attorneys. These attorneys will fight tooth and nail for you.
These guys were amazing. Just on the ball, knowledgeable and friendly as hell. I presented my case over the phone and I immediately got some preliminary feedback which was awesome. I was asked for more details which I provided via email the next day. Two…
Schedule an initial consultation to have Bryan Schwartz Law
evaluate your situation.
*Your submission of an intake request form does not guarantee that Bryan Schwartz Law will take your case or provide legal advice. You must be offered and sign a representation agreement with the firm before you will receive any legal advice.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.