“State Agency is the Latest Skeptic of Uber Settlement”
The Daily Journal, August 4, 2016
By Matthew Blake
The state is the latest critic of the proposed settlement between Uber Technologies Inc. and a class of California and Massachusetts drivers.
The California Labor and Workforce Development Agency filed a brief last Friday at U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen’s invitation, voicing skepticism about the $1 million set aside to drivers’ Private Attorneys General Act claims as part of the nearly $100 million deal Uber reached with plaintiffs in April.
“The agency can discern no rationale for allocating $1 million of the proposed settlement fund to the PAGA claim (out of a total settlement fund of $84 million to $100 million), other than that this is a ’round’ number and a large figure in comparison to other PAGA settlements,” wrote agency counsel John Cumming in the brief.
Cumming’s conclusion is similar to Chen’s, who wrote in a June court order he needs more information about why plaintiffs agreed to a “99.9 percent potential discount PAGA recovery” from plaintiffs’ estimate of more than $1 billion in civil penalties.
It is not clear if plaintiffs provided the requested information. Subsequent filings from plaintiffs’ attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan, a partner at Boston-based Lichten Liss-Riordan PC, focused on driver mileage and complaints that Uber no longer seeks to stay its appeal with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Messages left on Wednesday with Liss-Riordan, who is out of the U.S., and her co-counsel were not returned.
The labor agency brief may be another chink in the armor for a deal awaiting initial approval from Chen, who held a preliminary approval hearing two months ago. Also, the brief revealed lamentations from the state, which feels short-changed by PAGA settlements.
Under PAGA, workers sue on behalf of the state for labor code violations that result in civil penalties, and, if they succeed, collect 25 percent of all damages, with 75 percent going to state coffers.
The labor agency brief ruefully notes it is not aware of case law establishing a specific benchmark for how much goes to PAGA in a settlement when a judgment was not rendered on civil penalties. Instead, in class action settlement negotiations, “the easiest claim to compromise in such a negotiation may well be the PAGA claim.”
Bryan J. Schwartz of Bryan Schwartz Law said any grumblings from the state are misguided. “I think that the LWDA should be delighted to have a $1 million PAGA allocation in a case where the state did no work whatsoever and where the precise additional value of the PAGA claim is almost entirely speculative,” he said.
Where Schwartz, a plaintiff-side employment lawyer, and LWDA do agree is the rarity of a judge asking for the state’s input. Schwartz said he has never seen the state step in before, and LWDA spokesman Garin Casaleggio stated, “It is rare for the court to invite agency’s comments on proposed settlements, and [LWDA] has not received any invitations similar to this case.”
A message seeking comment Wednesday from Uber and lead counsel Theodore J. Boutrous of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP was not returned.
When no other attorney would touch my case, Bryan took it on with zeal. Since then, the EEOC certified a class action and has ruled in our favor in every motion the other side has thrown at us. A five-star rating does not come close…
I was fortunate to have found Bryan Schwartz Law while searching for reputable and reliable law firms in the Oakland area that specialized in labor law, and I couldn’t be more pleased by the results they secured for my family on my father’s behalf! After…
Bryan's firm came highly recommended to deal with an employment discrimination and harassment case. Bryan and his staff were very professional, ethical, extremely organized and diligent. They are strong advocates who worked extremely hard to get me a very fair resolution to my case. I…
Bryan Schwartz is an attorney who gives good, sound advice and empowers you to believe in your convictions. I reached out to him because no other attorney wanted to assist me. Bryan has been my advocate for the last six years. He is compassionate, empathetic…
Bryan Schwartz is without a doubt a fantastic attorney. As tenacious as he is intelligent, I would absolutely recommend his services to anyone seeking justice. Not only is his legal expertise top notch, his interpersonal skills with his clients are superb as well. Working with…
Bryan and his team were highly recommended by a friend and another attorney. I reached out to Bryan when I was sick, hurting and afraid, not knowing what to expect or how to ask for help. Bryan offered to help, he and his team fought…
When I first met Bryan, and the team at Bryan Schwartz Law, I was blown away by how understanding, sympathetic, and outright dismayed they were to the unlawful situation my coworkers and I were (to say the least) uncomfortably having to endure and work through.…
Bryan Schwartz represented me successfully in mediating my age discrimination claim against a large employer....[T]here can be few lawyers with greater legal acumen or a more relentless drive to get an acceptable result for their clients. Bryan is all business and probably works too hard.…
I could never imagine having any other attorney on my side when I needed someone. This office is beyond professional and intelligent from the person answering the phone right to the attorneys. These attorneys will fight tooth and nail for you.
These guys were amazing. Just on the ball, knowledgeable and friendly as hell. I presented my case over the phone and I immediately got some preliminary feedback which was awesome. I was asked for more details which I provided via email the next day. Two…
Schedule an initial consultation to have Bryan Schwartz Law
evaluate your situation.
*Your submission of an intake request form does not guarantee that Bryan Schwartz Law will take your case or provide legal advice. You must be offered and sign a representation agreement with the firm before you will receive any legal advice.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.