Bloomberg BNA, Daily Labor Report and Class Action Litigation Report, July 9, 2013
SAN FRANCISCO – A federal judge in California July 8 granted class certification to teen tour leaders who alleged they were not paid overtime on trips they led (Wright v. Adventures Rolling Cross Country Inc., N.D. Cal., No. 3:12-cv-00982, class certified 7/8/13).
Peter Wright and Michelle Trame alleged that Marin County, Calif., tour operator Adventures Rolling Cross Country Inc. paid trip leaders less than $2,000 for trips lasting from two weeks to 90 days.
Hundreds of leaders were not paid overtime or given duty-free meal and rest breaks during their 16- to 18-hour days, the lawsuit alleges. The claims were filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the California Labor Code.
In certifying the class, Judge Edward M. Chen of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ordered the parties to file by July 15 a joint supplemental brief regarding a proposed class notice and consent form.
“I certainly think that the industry needs to rethink how they do business, that they cannot put on these expensive, profit-generating trips and basically not pay their workers anything close to minimum wage,” plaintiffs’ counsel Bryan Schwarz with Bryan Schwartz Law in Oakland, Calif., said July 9.
Court Previously Found Tours Not a ‘Camp.’
Last April, Chen granted in part and denied in part the trip leaders’ summary judgment motion, finding that ARCC is not an “organized camp” with a site or camp for outdoor group living and is not exempt from minimum wage and overtime requirements under California and federal labor laws.
The court also denied the company’s summary judgment motion, finding that, under California Health and Safety Code Section 18897, an organized camp must be a site with both “programs and facilities.”
California Labor Code Section 1182.4 permits a weekly salary of at least 85 percent of the minimum wage for a 40-hour week, “regardless of the number of hours per week the student employee, camp counselor, or program counselor might work at the organized camp.”
Although tours might be in locations around the world, tour leaders spent 10 to 14 days in pre-trip planning and post-trip debriefing in California, the court found. It agreed with the chaperones that so long as they worked part of the week in the United States or California, the entire week should be counted under the FLSA or California Labor Code “even if the rest of the work was performed outside of the country or state.”
Chen cited Footnote 20 to 29 C.F.R. § 776.7, which states that work outside the country is FLSA exempt. When part of the work performed in any workweek is covered work performed in any state, the court said, “ ‘it makes no difference where the remainder of such work is performed; the employee is entitled to the benefits of the Act for the entire workweek unless he comes within some specific exemption‘ ” (emphasis added by the court).
Estimated 350 in Class.
The overall class of trip leaders for the class period is around 350, Reed Schaper, a partner with Hirschfeld Kraemer in Santa Monica, Calif., representing the employer, said July 10.
The class certification motion said ARCC has hired 80 to 90 trip leaders each summer since 2008.
Chen approved a class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 for claims brought under state law and a collective action certification under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) for claims brought under the FLSA.
The lawsuit, which challenges the company’s uniform, classwide exemption policy, was removed from Marin County Superior Court, where the complaint was filed Feb. 17, 2012 (35 DLR A-4, 2/22/12).
According to court documents, youths pay from $2,500 to $15,000 for the organized tours, and a typical trip would generate $150,000 gross revenue for ARCC, which organizes dozens of such trips a year. Destinations range from Australia to Alaska.
Defendant Scott Von Eschen, co-owner and president of Mill Valley, Calif.-based ARCC, and the tour company did not oppose the class certification motion.
“They didn’t have much of an argument. He granted summary judgment on their main affirmative defense so there’s not much left there,” Schwartz told BNA.
Schaper told BNA there “are a number of strategic and legal considerations that drove the decision not to oppose certification, but because of the ongoing nature of the proceedings, I can’t really go into detail.”
“The driving issue of the litigation was the applicability of the exemption to organized camps under the FLSA and the California Labor Code,” he said. “Based on the district court’s ruling that the exemption does not apply to trip and travel camps like ARCC that do not own or operate permanent camp facilities, and pending any possible appeal of that ruling, ARCC is complying with minimum wage and overtime obligations by paying an hourly rate and overtime when and where applicable rather than by a flat stipend per trip.”
In addition to Schwartz, the tour leaders were represented by David A. Lowe and John T. Mullan of Rudy Exelrod Zieff & Lowe in San Francisco. The company was represented by Reed E. Schaper of Hirschfeld Kraemer in Santa Monica, Calif., and Kristin L. Oliveira of Hirschfeld Kraemer in San Francisco.
When no other attorney would touch my case, Bryan took it on with zeal. Since then, the EEOC certified a class action and has ruled in our favor in every motion the other side has thrown at us. A five-star rating does not come close…
I was fortunate to have found Bryan Schwartz Law while searching for reputable and reliable law firms in the Oakland area that specialized in labor law, and I couldn’t be more pleased by the results they secured for my family on my father’s behalf! After…
Bryan's firm came highly recommended to deal with an employment discrimination and harassment case. Bryan and his staff were very professional, ethical, extremely organized and diligent. They are strong advocates who worked extremely hard to get me a very fair resolution to my case. I…
Bryan Schwartz is an attorney who gives good, sound advice and empowers you to believe in your convictions. I reached out to him because no other attorney wanted to assist me. Bryan has been my advocate for the last six years. He is compassionate, empathetic…
Bryan Schwartz is without a doubt a fantastic attorney. As tenacious as he is intelligent, I would absolutely recommend his services to anyone seeking justice. Not only is his legal expertise top notch, his interpersonal skills with his clients are superb as well. Working with…
Bryan and his team were highly recommended by a friend and another attorney. I reached out to Bryan when I was sick, hurting and afraid, not knowing what to expect or how to ask for help. Bryan offered to help, he and his team fought…
When I first met Bryan, and the team at Bryan Schwartz Law, I was blown away by how understanding, sympathetic, and outright dismayed they were to the unlawful situation my coworkers and I were (to say the least) uncomfortably having to endure and work through.…
Bryan Schwartz represented me successfully in mediating my age discrimination claim against a large employer....[T]here can be few lawyers with greater legal acumen or a more relentless drive to get an acceptable result for their clients. Bryan is all business and probably works too hard.…
I could never imagine having any other attorney on my side when I needed someone. This office is beyond professional and intelligent from the person answering the phone right to the attorneys. These attorneys will fight tooth and nail for you.
These guys were amazing. Just on the ball, knowledgeable and friendly as hell. I presented my case over the phone and I immediately got some preliminary feedback which was awesome. I was asked for more details which I provided via email the next day. Two…
Schedule an initial consultation to have Bryan Schwartz Law
evaluate your situation.
*Your submission of an intake request form does not guarantee that Bryan Schwartz Law will take your case or provide legal advice. You must be offered and sign a representation agreement with the firm before you will receive any legal advice.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.