Menu
Search

Daily Journal: Laid-off biotech employees sue board members and venture firms

Home
/
News & Events
/
In the News
/
Daily Journal: Laid-off biotech employees sue board members and venture firms

Daily Journal: Laid-off biotech employees sue board members and venture firms

Laid-off biotech employees sue board members and venture firms
The Daily Journal, May 16, 2014

By Laura Hautala

Laid-off employees seek unpaid wages, name investment funds and boards

Laid-off employees of a defunct biotechnology company sued Merck & Co. Inc. and two venture capital firms Wednesday, seeking unpaid wages and other damages.

It’s an unusual proposed class action that argues venture firms are responsible for employment law violations allegedly committed at a company they funded. It even names two individual board members, a move employment lawyers say is untested.

The suit claims the venture firms participated in fraud that transferred the assets of Irvine-based Aviir Inc. to another company after laying off all 85 employees without notice and then filing bankruptcy.

“These actions were taken at the expense of Aviir’s hard working employees who were denied pay and benefits,” the complaint alleges. Adelsohn v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al., BC545830 (Los Angeles Super Ct., filed May 14, 2014).

The companies named in the suit had representatives sitting on the board of Aviir at the time of the layoffs, the complaint alleges. Representatives from Merck and funder New Leaf Venture Partners declined comment, and the third named company, Bay City Capitol Management IV LLC, did not respond to requests.

Brian S. Kabateck, a plaintiffs’ attorney at Kabateck Brown Kellner LLP in Los Angeles, said the layoffs were in violation of the WARN Act, which in California requires 60 days’ notice for a mass layoff at a company of Aviir’s size. Kabateck filed the suit on behalf of the employees, saying the whole situation “smelled.”

The board members were involved in the fraud, he said. “Either they weren’t keeping a watchful eye on what they were doing or were aware of it and were part of it.”

Kabateck said he doesn’t expect the potential damages to be huge – $500,000 for the WARN act violations, plus other penalties, court costs and attorney fees – but “the circumstances were crying out for the lawsuit.”

Eric Kingsley, a plaintiffs’ attorney at Kingsley & Kingsley in Encino, said the case would hinge on whether board members were really responsible for the layoffs.

“The focus is on who’s controlling [the decision making],” he said. Based on precedents in California labor law, the companies could be held liable.

What’s more, naming individual board members to the lawsuit enters into untested ground. Bryan Schwartz, a plaintiffs’ attorney in Oakland not involved in this case, noted that neither the California Court of Appeal nor the state Supreme Court have said whether board members could be held liable for employment law violations.

Different standards apply to the different claims listed in the lawsuit, Schwartz said. But if the board was making decisions on hiring, firing and wages, “there’s a decent chance” that individual board members can be held liable.

laura_hautala@dailyjournal.com

Share this post
facebooktwitterLinkedin

Looking For
Help With Your
Workplace Concerns?

Bryan Schwartz Law is also one of the few Bay Area-based law firms with extensive experience representing Federal employees in their unique Merit Systems Protection Board and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaints.

Meet Our Award
Winning Team

What Our Clients
Say About Us

Get A Consultation*

Schedule an initial consultation to have Bryan Schwartz Law
evaluate your situation.

*Your submission of an intake request form does not guarantee that Bryan Schwartz Law will take your case or provide legal advice. You must be offered and sign a representation agreement with the firm before you will receive any legal advice.

Call Now Button