“Chase Arbitration Bid Fails In Appraiser OT Action”
Law360, March 14, 2011
By Samuel Howard
A California federal judge Friday rejected JPMorgan Chase Bank NA’s bid to arbitrate or stay a putative class action alleging the banking giant misclassified its home appraisers as exempt from overtime pay.
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California faulted Chase’s handling of the case and said the parties’ patchy arguments regarding the arbitration of the wage-and-hour claims prevents compelling an out-of-court resolution.
The plaintiffs contend Chase misclassified its appraisers as salaried employees and failed to pay them overtime in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and California labor law. Chase reclassified the appraisers as hourly employees in July or August, but failed to give them back pay for overtime hours worked during their years as salaried employees, the suit says.
While Chase sought arbitration before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority — without first conferring with the plaintiffs — and the plaintiffs subsequently consented to arbitrate the dispute at JAMS, the plaintiffs’ employment contracts stipulate other fora for addressing employment-related claims, according to the opinion.
The arbitration agreement only requires the employee to present claims before either the National Association of Securities Dealers Inc. or the New York Stock Exchange Inc., yet Chase appears to suggest, without supporting argument, that the court should substitute FINRA as the successor to those entities, according to the opinion.
“Defendants’ failure to meet and confer with opposing counsel has resulted in piecemeal and inchoate briefing of issues critical to this court’s ability to make an informed decision on the pending issues and requests,” Judge Armstrong said. “The court therefore denies defendant’s motion to compel arbitration, without prejudice.”
The court likewise noted the incompleteness of the plaintiffs’ argument in favor of a JAMS proceeding.
As an alternative to arbitration, Chase sought to stay the action pending the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, which addresses similar misclassification allegations.
Judge Armstrong, however, concluded Chase improperly advanced its arguments in reply to the complaint and otherwise “deprive[d] plaintiffs of the opportunity to address arguments that the defendant should have made in its moving papers.”
The plaintiffs estimate the proposed class could number in the thousands and are seeking overtime pay going back three years, plus interest and attorneys’ fees.
Earlier in March, two former Chase workers filed another nationwide putative class action claiming Chase does not record all the hours its nonexempt retail bank employees work.
A spokesman for Chase declined to comment on the ruling.
The plaintiffs in the current matter are represented by Bryan Schwartz Law’s Hillary Baker and Bryan Schwartz.
Chase is represented by Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP’s Carrie Gonell, Eric Meckley and Jennifer Lockhart.
The case is Adlao et al. v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al., case number 4:10-cv-04508, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
When no other attorney would touch my case, Bryan took it on with zeal. Since then, the EEOC certified a class action and has ruled in our favor in every motion the other side has thrown at us. A five-star rating does not come close…
I was fortunate to have found Bryan Schwartz Law while searching for reputable and reliable law firms in the Oakland area that specialized in labor law, and I couldn’t be more pleased by the results they secured for my family on my father’s behalf! After…
Bryan's firm came highly recommended to deal with an employment discrimination and harassment case. Bryan and his staff were very professional, ethical, extremely organized and diligent. They are strong advocates who worked extremely hard to get me a very fair resolution to my case. I…
Bryan Schwartz is an attorney who gives good, sound advice and empowers you to believe in your convictions. I reached out to him because no other attorney wanted to assist me. Bryan has been my advocate for the last six years. He is compassionate, empathetic…
Bryan Schwartz is without a doubt a fantastic attorney. As tenacious as he is intelligent, I would absolutely recommend his services to anyone seeking justice. Not only is his legal expertise top notch, his interpersonal skills with his clients are superb as well. Working with…
Bryan and his team were highly recommended by a friend and another attorney. I reached out to Bryan when I was sick, hurting and afraid, not knowing what to expect or how to ask for help. Bryan offered to help, he and his team fought…
When I first met Bryan, and the team at Bryan Schwartz Law, I was blown away by how understanding, sympathetic, and outright dismayed they were to the unlawful situation my coworkers and I were (to say the least) uncomfortably having to endure and work through.…
Bryan Schwartz represented me successfully in mediating my age discrimination claim against a large employer....[T]here can be few lawyers with greater legal acumen or a more relentless drive to get an acceptable result for their clients. Bryan is all business and probably works too hard.…
I could never imagine having any other attorney on my side when I needed someone. This office is beyond professional and intelligent from the person answering the phone right to the attorneys. These attorneys will fight tooth and nail for you.
These guys were amazing. Just on the ball, knowledgeable and friendly as hell. I presented my case over the phone and I immediately got some preliminary feedback which was awesome. I was asked for more details which I provided via email the next day. Two…
Schedule an initial consultation to have Bryan Schwartz Law
evaluate your situation.
*Your submission of an intake request form does not guarantee that Bryan Schwartz Law will take your case or provide legal advice. You must be offered and sign a representation agreement with the firm before you will receive any legal advice.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.