“Bank Of America Workers Get OK For $6M Wage Class Deal”
Law 360, January 26, 2017
By Cara Bayles
A California federal judge said at a hearing Thursday that he’ll grant preliminary approval to a $6.6 million deal to settle wage and hour claims brought by a class of 478 Bank of America employees who handle account setup, wiring funds and online banking for corporate clients.
The deal will grant at least $10,000 to each “client fulfillment specialist.” The employees had sued the bank alleging overtime, rest break, wage statement and timely payment claims.
Subclasses also brought claims under individual state laws. Thursday’s deal will use the statutes of the states where class members worked to determine how much they will get. Workers in California and Illinois, both of which have broader labor protections than states like North Carolina, stand to gain the most from the settlement.
U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg noted that the suit was worth an estimated $18 million and asked the plaintiffs why the settlement was the best outcome for the class.
“This is about a third,” he said. “Summarize for me why that’s a good deal.”
Class counsel Bryan Schwartz said he couldn’t find prior case law about these types of employees, which made it more difficult to determine the outcome of the case, but added that a trial would have been hard-fought and his clients might not have won all that they asked for. If Bank of America successfully argued that the employees were subject to a fluctuating workweek, for example, Schwartz said that would “decimate our claims.”
Schwartz said the bank would likely have argued at trial that the workers could qualify for an administrative exemption to wage and hour laws because they dealt with important business clients and had more discretion than most customer service representatives.
“I’m not saying we wouldn’t prevail over that. I think we’d have a pretty good shot. But there’s been no case like this,” he said. “With the current environment in federal courts, and the ways it’s evolving, exemptions may become more robust.”
Judge Seeborg called named plaintiff Allen Buckingham’s award of $15,000 on top of his class claim “pretty substantial” but conceded that the suit wouldn’t have existed without him.
Schwartz also told the judge that the Private Attorneys General Act payment of $75,000 was within the range for the Northern District of California.
The only change Judge Seeborg asked for was a provision affording a second attempt to reach class members who didn’t cash their checks. He recommended the parties “tweak it if you can,” adding “it’s enough money on a per class member basis that those checks shouldn’t end up in the trash.”
Counsel for Bank of America and for the class declined to comment on the case.
The class is represented by Eduard R Meleshinsky and Bryan Schwartz of Bryan Schwartz Law.
Bank of America is represented by John Arthur Van Hook, Michael David Mandel and Sylvia Jihae Kim of McGuireWoods LLP.
The case is Allen Buckingham et al. v. Bank of America Corp. Inc., case number 3:15-cv-06344, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
–Editing by Sara Ziegler.
When no other attorney would touch my case, Bryan took it on with zeal. Since then, the EEOC certified a class action and has ruled in our favor in every motion the other side has thrown at us. A five-star rating does not come close…
I was fortunate to have found Bryan Schwartz Law while searching for reputable and reliable law firms in the Oakland area that specialized in labor law, and I couldn’t be more pleased by the results they secured for my family on my father’s behalf! After…
Bryan's firm came highly recommended to deal with an employment discrimination and harassment case. Bryan and his staff were very professional, ethical, extremely organized and diligent. They are strong advocates who worked extremely hard to get me a very fair resolution to my case. I…
Bryan Schwartz is an attorney who gives good, sound advice and empowers you to believe in your convictions. I reached out to him because no other attorney wanted to assist me. Bryan has been my advocate for the last six years. He is compassionate, empathetic…
Bryan Schwartz is without a doubt a fantastic attorney. As tenacious as he is intelligent, I would absolutely recommend his services to anyone seeking justice. Not only is his legal expertise top notch, his interpersonal skills with his clients are superb as well. Working with…
Bryan and his team were highly recommended by a friend and another attorney. I reached out to Bryan when I was sick, hurting and afraid, not knowing what to expect or how to ask for help. Bryan offered to help, he and his team fought…
When I first met Bryan, and the team at Bryan Schwartz Law, I was blown away by how understanding, sympathetic, and outright dismayed they were to the unlawful situation my coworkers and I were (to say the least) uncomfortably having to endure and work through.…
Bryan Schwartz represented me successfully in mediating my age discrimination claim against a large employer....[T]here can be few lawyers with greater legal acumen or a more relentless drive to get an acceptable result for their clients. Bryan is all business and probably works too hard.…
I could never imagine having any other attorney on my side when I needed someone. This office is beyond professional and intelligent from the person answering the phone right to the attorneys. These attorneys will fight tooth and nail for you.
These guys were amazing. Just on the ball, knowledgeable and friendly as hell. I presented my case over the phone and I immediately got some preliminary feedback which was awesome. I was asked for more details which I provided via email the next day. Two…
Schedule an initial consultation to have Bryan Schwartz Law
evaluate your situation.
*Your submission of an intake request form does not guarantee that Bryan Schwartz Law will take your case or provide legal advice. You must be offered and sign a representation agreement with the firm before you will receive any legal advice.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.